1. Aranda, V., C. Macci, E. Peruzzi and G. Masciandaro. 2015. Biochemical activity and chemical structural properties of soil organic matter after 17 years of amendments with olive-mill pomace co-compost. Journal of Environmental Management, 147(6): 278- 285. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.024]
2. Asadian, M., S.M. Hojjati., M.R. Pourmajidian and A. Fallah. 2012. The effect of different land uses on soil quality in Alandan Forest, Sari. Natural Geographical Researches, 45(3): 65-76.
3. Bonifácio, E., S. Santoni, P. Cudlin and E. Zanini. 2008. Effect of dominant ground vegetation on soilorganic matter quality in a declining mountain spruce forest of central Europe. Boreal Environmental Research, 13(5):113-120.
4. Celik, I. 2005. Land-use effects on organic matter and physical properties of soil in a southern Mediterranean highland of Turkey. Soil and Tillage Research, 83(7): 270-277. [
DOI:10.1016/j.still.2004.08.001]
5. Ebrahimi M., S. Kashani and E. Rouhimoghaddam. 2015. Effect of land use change from rangeland to agricultural land on soil fertility in Taftan region. Water and Soil science, 26(3): 31-44 (In Persian).
6. Ghazan-Shahi, J. 1997. Soil and Plant Analysis. Aeizch publication, Tehran.
7. Guimarães, D.V., M.I. SilvaGonzaga, T.O. daSilva, T.L. da Silva, N. daSilvaDias and M.A. SilvaMatias. 2013. Soil organic matter pools and carbon fractions in soil under different land uses. Soil and Tillage Research, 126(3): 177-182. [
DOI:10.1016/j.still.2012.07.010]
8. Isermeyer, H. 1952. Eine einfache Methode zur Bestimmung der Bodenmung und der Carbonate im Boden. Zpflanzenernaehr Bodenkd, 56(3): 26-38. [
DOI:10.1002/jpln.19520560107]
9. Islam, K.R. and R.R. Weil. 2000. Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 79(6): 9-16. [
DOI:10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00145-0]
10. Kooch, Y., F. Rostayee and S.M. Hosseini. 2016. Effects of tree species on topsoil properties and nitrogen cycling in natural forest and tree plantations of northern Iran. Catena. 144(5): 65-73. [
DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2016.05.002]
11. Kotzé, E., P.F. Loke, M.C. Akhosi-Setaka and C.C. Preez. 2016. Land use change affecting soil humic substances in three semi-arid agro-ecosystems in South Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 216(8): 194-202. [
DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.007]
12. Lopez, R., D. Gondar. A. Iglesias., S. Fiol. J. Antelo and F. Arce. 2008. Acid properties of fulvic and humic acids isolated from two acid forest soils under different vegetation cover and soil depth. European Journal of Soil Sciences, 59(4): 892-899. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01048.x]
13. Losi, C.J., T.G. Siccama. R.C. Juan and E. Morales. 2003. Analysis of Alternate Methods for Estimating Carbon Stock in Young Tropical Plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 184(5): 355-368. [
DOI:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00160-9]
14. Malakpour, B., T. Ahmadi and S. Kazemi-Mazandarani. 2011. The effects of land use exchange on physical and chemical properties in Kohneh Lashak Kojour, Nowshahr. Journal of Science Technology and Natural Resources, 6(3): 115-126.
15. Mohammadian, M. and M.J. Malakouti. 2002. Effect of Two Types of Composts on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Corn Yield. Journal of Water and Soil, 16(4): 143-149 (In Persian).
16. Moral, R., J. Moreno-Caselles, M.D. Perez-Murcia, A. Perez-Espinosa, B. Rufete, and C. Paredes. 2005. Characterization of the organic matter pool in manures. Bioresources, 96(4): 153-158. [
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.05.003]
17. Neher, A., D.A.J. Wu, M.E. Barbercheck and O. Anasd. 2005. Ecosystem type affects interpretation of soil nematode community measures. Applied Soil Ecology, 30(7): 47-64. [
DOI:10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.01.002]
18. Seyghalani S., H. Ramezanpour and E. Kahneh. 2015. Effect of Populus caspica, Alnus glutinosa and Taxodium distichum on some soil chemical properties in forest lands of Astaneh Ashrafieh. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 29 (2): 233-241 (In Persian).
19. Sigurdsson B.D. and B.E. Gudleifsson. 2013. Impact of afforestation on earthworm populations in Iceland. ICEL. Agriculture Sciences, 26(3): 21-36.
20. SPSS Inc. Released 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc.
21. Stevenson, F.J. 1994. Humus chemistry: genesis, composition and reactions. John Wiley and Sons, New York
22. Va'zquez, C., A.G. Iriarte. C. Merlo. A. Abril. E. Kowaljow and J.M. Meriles. 2016. Land use impact on chemical and spectroscopical characteristics of soil organic matter in an arid ecosystem. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(5): 1-13. [
DOI:10.1007/s12665-016-5655-9]
23. Vorobeichik, E.L. 1997. On the methods for measuring forest litter thickness, to diagnose the technogenic disturbances of ecosystems. Russian Journal of Ecology, 28(4): 230-234.
24. Wander, M.M. and S.J. Traina. 1996. Organic matter fractions from organically and conventionally managed soils: II. Characterization of composition. Soil Science Society American Journal, 60(5): 1087-1094. [
DOI:10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000040018x]
25. Yesilonis, I., K. Szlavecz, R. Pouyat, D. Whigham and L. Xia. 2016. Historical land use and stand age effects on forest soil properties in the Mid-Atlantic US. Forest Ecology and Management, 370(9): 83-92. [
DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.046]
26. Zalba, P., N.M. Amiotti, J.A. Galantini and S. Pistola. 2016. Soil humic and fulvic acids from different land use systems evaluated by E4/E6 Ratios. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2016.1206558. [
DOI:10.1080/00103624.2016.1206558]