1. Berg, B. and R. Laskowski. 2006. Changes in substrate composition and rate regulating factors. In litter decomposition: a guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Elsevier, London, 421 pp. [
DOI:10.1016/S0065-2504(05)38004-4]
2. Berg, B. and C. McClaugherty. 2008. Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
3. Berg, B. and C. McClaugherty. 2014. Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
4. Berg, B., A. De Marco, M. Davey, B. Emmett, S. Hobbie, C. Liu, C. McClaugherty, L. Norell, M.B. Johansson, F. Rutigliano, L. Vesterdal and A. Virzo De Santo. 2010. Limit values for foliar litter decomposition - pine forests. Biogeochemistry, 100: 57-73. [
DOI:10.1007/s10533-009-9404-y]
5. Berg, B., B. Erhagen, M.B. Johansson, L. Vesterdal, M. Faituri, P. Sanborn and M. Nilsson. 2013. Manganese dynamics in decomposing needle and leaf litter - a synthesis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 43: 1127-1136. [
DOI:10.1139/cjfr-2013-0097]
6. Berg, B., K.T. Steffen and C. McClaugherty. 2007. Litter decomposition rate is dependent on litter Mn concentrations. Biogeochemistry, 82(1): 29-39. [
DOI:10.1007/s10533-006-9050-6]
7. Cleveland, C.C., S. Reed, A. Keller, D. Nemergut, S. O'Neill, R. Ostertag and P. Vitousek. 2014. Litter quality versus soil microbial community controls over decomposition: a quantitative analysis. Oecologia, 174(1): 283-294. [
DOI:10.1007/s00442-013-2758-9]
8. Cotrufo, M.F., M.D. Wallenstein., C.M. Boot, K. Denef and E. Paul. 2013. The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: Do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Global Change Biology, 19: 988-995. [
DOI:10.1111/gcb.12113]
9. Datry, T., R. Corti, C. Claret and M. Philippe. 2011. Flow intermittence controls leaf litter breakdown in a French temporary alluvial river: the "drying memory". Aquatic Sciences, 73: 471-483. [
DOI:10.1007/s00027-011-0193-8]
10. Delgado-Baquerizo, M., P. García-Palacios, R. Milla, A. Gallardo and F.T. Maestre. 2015. Soil characteristics determine soil carbon and nitrogen availability during leaf litter decomposition regardless of litter quality. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 81: 134-142. [
DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.009]
11. Eldhuset, T.D., O.J. Kjønaas and H. Lange. 2017. Decomposition rates and nutrient dynamics of Picea abies needles, twigs and fine roots after stem-only harvesting in eastern and western Norway. Plant Soil, 418: 357-375. [
DOI:10.1007/s11104-017-3302-1]
12. Ferreiraa, V., J. Korichevab, J. Pozoc and A.S.M. Graçaa. 2016. A meta-analysis on the effects of changes in the composition of native forests on litter decomposition in streams. Forest Ecology and Management, 364: 27-38. [
DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.002]
13. Freschet, G. T., R. Aerts and J.H.C. Cornelissen. 2012. Multiple mechanisms for trait effects on litter decomposition: moving beyond home-field advantage with a new hypothesis. Journal of Ecology, 100 (3): 619-630. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01943.x]
14. Frey, S.D., E.T. Elliott, K. Paustian and G.A. Peterson. 2000. Fungal translocation as a mechanism for soil nitrogen inputs to surface residue decomposition in a no-tillage agro ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32: 689-698. [
DOI:10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00205-9]
15. Ghasemi Aghbash, F. and M. Zarafshar. 2018. Leaf litter Decomposition and Nutrient Dynamics of Persian Oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) in the Northern Zagros Forests (Case Study: Chahar Zabar forests of Kermanshah). Iranian Journal of Forest, 10(3): 347-359 (In Persian).
16. Ghasemi Aghbash, F., GH.A. Jalali, V. Hosseini, S.M. Hosseini and B. Berg. 2012. Nutrient dynamic of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L) Karst) litter mixed with litter of Beech (Fagus orientalis lipsky), Alder (Alnus subcordata C.A.Meyer) and Maple (Acer velutinum Boiss.) in pure Norway spruce plantation of Lajim site. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 20(2): 286-298 (In Persian).
17. Ghasemi Aghbash, F., GH.A. Jalali, V. Hosseini and S.M. Hosseini. 2014. Assessment of Home -Field Advantage (HFA) of Litter Decomposition in Beech and Alder Sites and in Norway spruce Plantation of Lajim Region. Iranian Forests Ecology, 2(3): 13-25 (In Persian).
18. Gulis, V., V. Ferreira and M.A.S. Graça., 2006. Stimulation of leaf litter decomposition and associated fungi and invertebrates by moderate eutrophication: implications for stream assessment. Freshwa. Biol, 51: 1655-1669. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01615.x]
19. Klotzbücher, T., K. Kaiser, G. Guggenberger, C. Gatzek and K. Kalbitz. 2011. A new conceptual model for the fate of lignin in decomposing plant litter. Ecology, 92: 1052-1062. [
DOI:10.1890/10-1307.1]
20. Lindahl, B.D., K. Ihrmark, J. Boberg, S. Trumbore, P. Högberg, J. Stenlid and R.D. Finlay. 2007. Spatial separation of litter decomposition and mycorrhizal nitrogen uptake in boreal forests, New Phytologist, 173: 611-620. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01936.x]
21. Manzoni, S., J.A. Trofymow, R.B. Jackson and A. Porporato. 2010. Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter. Ecological Monographs, 80: 89-106. [
DOI:10.1890/09-0179.1]
22. Parton, W., W.L. Silver, I.C. Burke., L. Grassens, M.E. Harmon, W.S. Currie, J.Y. King, E.C. Adair, L.A. Brandt and S.C. Hart., 2007. Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science, 315 (5810): 361-364. [
DOI:10.1126/science.1134853]
23. Verne, I.K. 2017. Decomposition of Beech and Spruce Litter in Neighboring Beech and Spruce Forests. Master's Thesis, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 29 pp.
24. Young, R.G., C.D. Matthaei and C.R. Townsend. 2008. Organic matter breakdown and ecosystem metabolism: functional indicators for assessing river ecosystem health. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 27(3): 605-625. [
DOI:10.1899/07-121.1]