Volume 7, Issue 13 (6-2019)                   ifej 2019, 7(13): 20-28 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hoseinpour A, oladi J, Akbari H, sarajian M. Recognizing Plant Tension in Plantations by use of UAVs Visible Light Detector. (Case Study: Nekazalemrood Forestry Plan). ifej. 2019; 7 (13) :20-28
URL: http://ifej.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-228-en.html
Faculty of Natural Resources, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Iran
Abstract:   (963 Views)
    The use of lightweight and cheap UAVs to detect the health of forests and identify the tension of planted can be useful to prevent the spread of pests and diseases. In the present research, a lightweight quadcopter drone with a 12-megapixel camera, visible light range was used. This UAV was emploied to detect leaf tension of pure Quercus Castanifolia plantation, pure Acer Velutinum and their mixture in nine sample with 1-3 hectares. Flight at altitudes of 40, 70 and 100 meters was used to determine UAV ability for detecting areas plantations tension. The flight plan was designed in the form of 75% latitude coverage and 80% longitudinal coverage. Supervised classification such as Neural Net, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Maximum Likelihood and Mahalanobis Distance algorithms are used and 25% of samples were used to check the classification accuracy. Visible color saturation image and some vegetation indices such as vegetation index (NGRDI) and (EXG), has great potential for detecting leaf tension in trees and seedlings. The Jeffries-Matusita coefficient ranged from 1.81 to 1.97, and the Transformed Divergence was 1/87 to 1.98, indicating the degree of separation of educational samples. The overall accuracy of Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm as best method was 83 to 96.7 percent for all samples and the kappa coefficient was 0.89 to 0.98. The results revealed the high capability of visibility light sensor cameras mounted on a UAV in detecting tree leaf tension. The best flight height is between 70-100 M. Using image enhancement techniques, especially color saturation and vegetation indices, the range of visible light spectrum such as vegetation index (NGRDI) and (EXG) to detect leaf tension increase the effectiveness of these images. Design of an automatic imaging system adapted to the altitude variation of the tree crown is recommender in order to prevent a minimum level of overlapping.

 
Full-Text [PDF 2417 kb]   (342 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: سنجش از دور
Received: 2018/03/19 | Accepted: 2018/06/23 | Published: 2019/06/15

References
1. Berni, J.A.J., P.J.Z. Tejada, L. Suárez and E. Fereres. 2009. Thermal and narrow-band multispectral remote sensing for vegetation monitoring from an unmanned aerial vehicle, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(3): 722-738. [DOI:10.1109/TGRS.2008.2010457]
2. Clemens, S.R. 2012. Procedures for correcting digital camera imagery acquired by the AggieAir remote sensing platform. Utah State University, 47.
3. Cornforth, W., C. Nichol and J. Suarez. 2010. Remote sensing for practical forestry: Arboriculture to UAVs, University of Edinburgh, 24.
4. Gitelson, A. 2002. Vegetation and soil lines in visible spectral space: a concept and technique for remote estimation of vegetation fraction. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(2002): 2562-2537. [DOI:10.1080/01431160110107806]
5. González, V., P.J.Z. Tejada, J.A. Berni, L. Suárez, D. Goldhamer and E. Fer-eres. 2012. Almond tree canopy temperature reveals intra-crown variability that is water stress-dependent. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 154-155, 156-165. [DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.11.004]
6. Hague, T., N. Tillet and H. Wheeler. 2006. Automated crop and weed monitoring in widely spaced cereals. Precision Agriculture, 1(1): 95-113. [DOI:10.1007/s11119-005-6787-1]
7. Hunt, E.R., M. Cavigelli, C.S.T. Daughtry, J.E. McMurtrey and C.L. Walthall. 2005. Evaluation of digital photography from model aircraft for remote sensing of crop biomass and nitrogen status, Precis. Agric, 6: 359-378. [DOI:10.1007/s11119-005-2324-5]
8. Hunt, E.R., W.D. Hively, C.S. Daughtry, G.W. McCarty, S.J. Fujikawa, T. Ng, M. Tranchitella, D.S. Linden and D.W. Yoel. 2008. Remote sensing of crop leaf area index using unmanned airborne vehicles, In: In Proceedings of the Pecora 17Symposium, Denver, CO.
9. Jannoura, R., K. Brinkmann, D. Uteau, C. Bruns and R.G. Joergensen. 2015. Monitoring of crop biomass using true colour aerial photographs taken from a remote controlled hexacopter. Biosyst. Eng, 129: 341-351. [DOI:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.11.007]
10. Kataoka, T., T. Kaneko, H. Okamoto and S. Hata. 2003. Crop growth estimation system using machine vision. In The 2003 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics.
11. Neto, J.C. 2004. A combined statistical-soft computing approach for classification and mapping weed pecies in minimum tillage systems. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.
12. Rango, A., A. Laliberte, J.E. Herrick, C. Winters, K. Havstad, C. Steele and D. Browning. 2009. Unmanned aerial vehicle-based remote sensing for rangeland assessment, monitoring and management, J. Appl. Remote Sens, 3, Article No: 033542. [DOI:10.1117/1.3216822]
13. Tejada, P.J.Z., M.L. Guillén-Climent, R. Hernández-Clemente, A. Catalina, M.R. González and P. Martín. 2013. Estimating leaf carotenoid content in vineyards using high resolution hyperspectral imagery acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 171-172, 281-294. [DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.12.013]
14. Torres-Sánchez, J., J.M. Pena, A.I. De Castro and F. López-Granados. 2014. Multi-temporal mapping of the vegetation fraction in early-season wheat fields using images from UAV, Comp. Electron. Agric, 103: 104-113. [DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2014.02.009]
15. Woebbecke, D.M., G.E. Meyer, K. Von Bargen and D.A. Mortensen. 1995. Shape features for identifying young weeds using image analysis. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 38(1): 271-281. [DOI:10.13031/2013.27839]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Ecology of Iranian Forest

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb