Volume 7, Issue 13 (6-2019)                   ifej 2019, 7(13): 29-35 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Pour-Gholi Z, Iran-Doost F, Sefidi K, Sagheb-Talebi K, Keivan-Behjo F. Investigating the Structure of Beech Stands in the Gap Making Phase (Case study: Asalem Forests, Guilan). ifej. 2019; 7 (13) :29-35
URL: http://ifej.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-227-en.html
Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources Technology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
Abstract:   (778 Views)
     Forest structure consider the spatial arrangement of trees characteristics such as age, size, species, gender and so on is.This study aimed to investigate the structural diversity of three one-hectare stands in the gap making phase, were studied. For this purpose, three sample plots with a one hectare area were selected in Asalem beech stands which belonged to the structural features of the gap making phase and studied. In each plot 30×30 m network were established. After implementing the network, the quantitative and qualitative features of the two beech trees at the closest distance to the intersection of the network as the references trees number one and two with three neighboring trees belonging to each of the references trees located at the nearest distance, was taken. The distance between the references trees and neighbors, as well as the distance between the neighboring trees, were measured relative to each other, and based on the Pythagorean trigonometric relationships, the angle between the references trees and the neighbors were measured. According to the results of this study, the average of species mingling, diameter differenation, height differenation and neighbor distance is 0.23, 0.43, 0.87 and 4.87 meters, respectively. By using of data from structure of intact stands, not only the current structure of various species can be quantified but also, their evolutionary process as well as the results of the forest management activities can be assessed.
Full-Text [PDF 786 kb]   (182 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: اکولوژی جنگل
Received: 2018/03/18 | Accepted: 2018/05/14 | Published: 2019/06/15

1. Akhavan, R. and Kh. Sagheb-Talebi. 2012. Application of bivariate Ripley's K-function for studying competition and spatial association of trees (Case study: intact Oriental beech stands in Kelardasht). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar research, 19(4): 632-644 (In Persian).
2. Akhavan, R., KH. Sagheb-Talebi, E.K. Zenner and F. Safavimanesh. 2012. Spatial patterns in different forest development stages of an intact old-growth Oriental beech forest in the Caspian region of Iran. European. Journal of Forest Research, 131(5): 1355-1366.‌ [DOI:10.1007/s10342-012-0603-z]
3. Alijani, V., KH. Sagheb-Talebi and R. Akhavan. 2014. Quantifying structure of intact beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands at different development stages(Case study: Kelardasht area, Mazandaran). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 21(3): 396-410 (In Persian).
4. Amanzadeh, B., Kh. Sagheb-Talebi, B.S. Foumani, F. Fadaie, J. Camarero and J.C. Linares. 2013. Spatial Distribution and Volume of Dead Wood in Unmanaged Caspian Beech (Fagus orientalis) Forests from Northern Iran. Forests, 4: 751-765. [DOI:10.3390/f4040751]
5. Amanzadeh, B., M. Pourmajidian, Kh. Sagheb-Talebi and S.M. Hojjati. 2015. Spatial pattern, competition and spatial association of trees in mixed hornbeam stands using univariate and bivariate Ripley's k function (Case study: reserve area, District 3 of Asalem forests).‌ Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 23(1): 37-52 (In Persian).
6. Ferris, R., N. Lust, V. Kint and A.F.M. Olsthoorn. 2000. Quantification of forest stand structure applied to Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests. Investigación agrarian, sistemasy recursos Forestales, 9(1): 147-164.‌
7. Graz, P.F. 2004. The behavior of the species mingling index Msp in relation to species dominance and dispersion. European Journal of Forest Research, 123: 87-92. [DOI:10.1007/s10342-004-0016-8]
8. Habashi, H., S.M. Hosseini, J. Mohammadi and R. Rahmani. 2007. Stand structure and spatial pattern of trees in mixed Hyrcanian beech forests of Iran. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 15: 55-64 (In Persian).
9. Kakavand, M., K. Sefidi, Kh. Sagheb-Talebi and M.R. Marvie Mohadjer. 2014. Structural diversity of mixed beech stands in the middle stage of succession (case study: Gorazbon, Kheiroud Forest of Nowshahr). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 22(3): 411-422 (In Persian).
10. Kint, V., D. Wulf Robert and L. Noel. 2004. Evaluation of sampling methods for the estimation of structural indices in forest stands. Ecological modeling, 180: 461-476. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.04.032]
11. Krebs, C.J. 1999. Ecological Methodology. 2nd ed., Addison Welsey Educational Publishers, Inc., Menlo Park, Califórnia., USA. 327 pp.
12. Leibundgut, H. 1959. Über Zweck und Methodik der Struktur-und Zuwachsanalyse von Urwäldern. Schweizerische Zeitsschrift für Forstwesen, 110: 111-124.
13. Moravie, M.A. and R. Audrey. 2003. A model to assess relationships between forest dynamics and spatial structure. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14(6): 823-834. [DOI:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02215.x]
14. Moridi, M., K. Sefidi and V. Etemad. 2015. Stand characteristics of mixed oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands in the stem exclusion phase, northern Iran. European Journal of Forest Research, 134(4): 693-703. [DOI:10.1007/s10342-015-0883-1]
15. Pommerening, A. 1997. An analysis of new approaches toward stand inventory in structure-rich forests. Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Forestry and Forest Ecology, University of Göttingen, Cuvillier Verlag,Göttingen.
16. Pommerening, A. 2002. Approaches to quantifying forest structures. Forestry, 75(3): 305-324. [DOI:10.1093/forestry/75.3.305]
17. Aguirre, O., G. Hui, K.V. Gadow and J. Jimenez. 2003. An analysis of forest structure using neighborhood based variables. Forest Ecology and Management, 183: 137-145. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00102-6]
18. Pastorella, F. and A. Paletto. 2013. Stand structure indices as tools to support forest management: an application in Trentino forests(Italy). Journal of Forest Science, 59(4): 159-168. [DOI:10.17221/75/2012-JFS]
19. Pommerening, A. 2006. Evaluating structural indices by reversing forest structural analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 224(3): 266-277. [DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.039]
20. Pommerening, A. and D. Stoyan. 2008. Reconstructing spatial tree point patterns from nearest neighbour summary statistics measured in small subwindows. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38(5): 1110-1122. [DOI:10.1139/X07-222]
21. Río, M., H. Pretzsch, I. Alberdi, K. Bielak, F. Bravo, A. Brunner, S. Condés, M. Ducey, T. Fonseca, N. Lupke, M. Pach, S. Peric, T. Perot, Z. Souidi, P. Spathelf, H. Steba, H. Tijardovic, M. Tome, S. Margarida., P. Vallet and A. Bravo. 2016. Characterization of the structure, dynamics, and productivity of mixed-species stands: review and perspectives. European Journal of Forest Research, 135(1): 23-49. [DOI:10.1007/s10342-015-0927-6]
22. Ruprecht, H., A. Dhar, B. Aigner, G. Oitzinger, K. Raphael and H. Vacik. 2010. Structural diversity of English yew (Taxus bacata L.) populations. European Journal of Forest Research, 129(2): 189-198. [DOI:10.1007/s10342-009-0312-4]
23. Sefidi, K., C.A. Copenheaver, M. Kakavand and F.K. Behjou. 2015. Structural diversity within mature forests in northern Iran: a case study from a relic population of Persian ironwood (Parrotia persica CA Meyer). Forest Science, 61(2): 258-265. [DOI:10.5849/forsci.13-096]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Ecology of Iranian Forest

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb