1. Abrary vajary, k. (2017).Correlation between canopy clearances due to the implementation of single selection method and humus layer thickness in beech forest (Case study: Al-Nandan Sari Rashistan). Iranian Forest and Spruce Research Quarterly. Vol.24, No.3-Pages 548-541. [In Persian]
2. Asghari Sorkhi, A.; Hojjati, S.M .; Jalilund, H.; Experimental, M. (2015). The effect of canopy composition on soil properties in pure and mixed beech stands (Case study: Alandan-Sari), Journal of Renewable Natural Resources Research, 3 (21): 1-10. [In Persian]
3. Daneshvar, A.; Rahmani, R.; Habashi, H. (2007). The heterogeneity of structure in mixed beech forest (case study shastkalateh, Gorgan), J. Agric. Sci. Natur. Resour., 14 (2): 1-12. [In Persian]
4. Dehdashtifar, M .; Jalali, S.Gh.A.; Esmailzadeh, O.; Kahyani, S. (2007). 2014. Influence of canopy gaps size and dead trees on natural regeneration in the Experimental Forest Station of Tarbiat Modares University, J. of Wood & Forest Science and Technology, 21 (2): 149-168. [In Persian]
5. Kern, Ch. C., Montgomery, R. A., Reich, P. B., and Strong, T. F. (2014). Harvest-Created canopy gaps increase species and functional trait diversity of the forest ground-layer community. Forest Science, 60(2): 335-344. [
DOI:10.5849/forsci.13-015]
6. Kooch, Y.; Hosseini, S.M.; Akbarinia, M.; Tabari, M.; and Jalali, S. Gh. (2010). The role of dead tree in regeneration density of mixed beech stand (case study: Sardabrood forests, Chalous, Mazindaran), Iranian Journal of Forest, 2 (2): 93-103. [In Persian]
7. Muscolo, A., Sidari, M., and Mercurio, R. (2017). Influence of gap size on organic matter decomposition, microbial biomass and nutrient cycle in Calabrian pine (Pinus laricio, Poiret) stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 242: 412-418. [
DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.058]
8. Muscolo, A., Sidari, M., Bagnato, S., Mallamaci, C. and Mercuri, R., (2010). Gap size effects on above- and below-ground processes in a silver fir stand. European Journal of Forest Research, 129: 355-365. [
DOI:10.1007/s10342-009-0341-z]
9. Prescott, C., (2000). The influence of the forest canopy on nutrient cycling. Tree Physiology, 22: 1193-1200. [
DOI:10.1093/treephys/22.15-16.1193]
10. Promis. A., S. Gärtner, A. Reif and G. Cruz. (2012). Effects of canopy gaps on forest floor vascular and non-vascular plant species composition and diversity in an uneven-aged Nothofagusbetuloides forest in Tierra del Fuego, Chile. Community Ecology, 13: 145-154. [
DOI:10.1556/ComEc.13.2012.2.3]
11. Renato, A. Ferreira l. (2005). Gap size measurement: The proposal of a new field method. Forest Ecology and Management, 214: 413-419. [
DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.011]
12. Sefidi , K., Z. Pour-Gholi, Kh. Sagheb-Talebi and F. Keivan-Behjo. (2016). Structural Characteristics of Canopy Gaps in the Gap Making Phase in the Evolution of Beech Stands in the Asalem Forests- Guilan, Journal Ecology of Iranian Forests Vol. 4, No. 7. [In Persian]
13. Sefidi, K.; Marvi Mohajer, M; Trust, and. (2014). Dynamics of sprouts and regeneration of beech seedlings in mixed beech forests, Conference of Tehran University Student Forestry Scientific Association, 18 pages.[In Persian]
14. Shabani, S.; Akbarinia, M.; Jalali, G., Aliarab, A.R. (2011). Relationship between Soil Characteristics and Beech Regeneration Density in Canopy Gaps with Different Sizes, J. of Wood & Forest Science and Technology, 18 (3): 63-77. [In Persian]
15. Sorkhi Laleloum. F. Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab. A. Shafag Kolvanagh. J. Fateh. M. (2012). Assessment of intra- and inter-specific competition between wheat (Triticum aestivum) and wild oat (Avena fatua) by reciprocal yield model and competition indices. Cereal Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2012 (96-106). [In Persian]
16. Van der Maarel, E. and Franklin, J. (2013). Vegetation Ecology, 2nd. ed. Wiley-Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.), Chichester, UK, XVI. [
DOI:10.1002/9781118452592]
17. Whittaker, H. (1972). Evolution and Measurement of cies Diversity Taxon 21(2/3), 213-225. [
DOI:10.2307/1218190]
18. Ymamoto, s. (2000). Forest gap dynamics and tree regeneration. J. For. Res. 5: 223-229. [
DOI:10.1007/BF02767114]