دوره 9، شماره 17 - ( بهار و تابستان 1400 )                   جلد 9 شماره 17 صفحات 151-142 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

jafarisarabi H, pilehvar B, abrarivajari K, waezmousavi S. (2021). Changes in Carbon Sequestration and some Edaphic Traits in Forest Types of CEntral Zagros (Case Study: The forests of Lorestan Province). ifej. 9(17), 142-151. doi:10.52547/ifej.9.17.142
URL: http://ifej.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-363-fa.html
جعفری سرابی حمزه، پیله ور بابک، ابراری واجاری کامبیز، واعظ موسوی سید محمد. تغییرات ترسیب کربن و برخی ویژگی های خاک در تیپ های جنگلی زاگرس میانی (مطالعه موردی: جنگل های استان لرستان) بوم شناسی جنگل های ایران (علمی- پژوهشی) 1400; 9 (17) :151-142 10.52547/ifej.9.17.142

URL: http://ifej.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-363-fa.html


گروه جنگلداری، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه لرستان، خرم باد، ایران
چکیده:   (2604 مشاهده)

    گونه­ های درختی از مهم­ ترین عوامل تاثیرگذار بر ویژگی­های خاک از طریق تولید لاشریزه بوده و نقش اساسی در چرخۀ کربن و آزاد­سازی عناصر غذایی خاک دارند. پژوهش حاضر به بررسی تغییرات ترسیب کربن و برخی ویژگی­های خاک در تیپ­های جنگلی زاگرس میانی، جنگل­های استان لرستان، در ارتباط با گونه های درختی غالب منطقه می ­پردازد. در مطالعه حاضر برخی از ویژگی­های زیستی درختان در تیپ­های جنگلی بلوط ایرانی، دارمازو و گلابی وحشی با استفاده از 24 قطعه ­نمونه 500 متر مربعی تصادفی (25×20 متر) اندازه ­گیری شد. همچنین خاک زیراشکوب تیپ­های مورد مطالعه با استفاده از 48 نمونه ترکیبی از عمق­های 10-0 و 30-10 سانتی­متری برداشت شد. پس از اندازه­ گیری متغیرهای مورد مطالعه، مقایسه آماری میانگین متغیرهای جنگل ­شناسی، خاکی و ترسیب کربن در تیپ‌های جنگلی با استفاده از آنالیز واریانس یک‌طرفه انجام گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که تیپ­های جنگلی مورد مطالعه بدون اختلاف معنی­ دار در مقادیر درصد تاج پوشش، دارای اختلاف معنی ­داری در پارامترهای ارتفاع تاج­ پوشش و تراکم بودند. تیپ­ های جنگلی ضمن اختلاف معنی­ دار در مقادیر ترسیب کربن، بافت، نیتروژن، کربن آلی، نسبت کربن به نیتروژن، پتاسیم، pH و رطوبت اشباع عمق اول، فاقد اختلاف در مقادیر آهک، هدایت الکتریکی، کلسیم، وزن مخصوص ظاهری و رطوبت اشباع عمق دوم بودند. بدین­ معنی که بیشترین میزان رس، سیلت و pH خاک در تیپ ­های جنگلی گلابی وحشی و بلوط دارمازو و بیشترین مقادیر ترسیب کربن، شن، پتاسیم، نیتروژن، کربن آلی و رطوبت اشباع عمق اول در خاک جنگلی بلوط ایرانی مشاهده شد. در این رابطه ارتفاع تاج­پوشش مهمترین متغیری بود که با ترسیب کربن، نیتروژن، کربن آلی، پتاسیم، pH و رطوبت اشباع خاک همبستگی نشان داد. به­ طور­کلی نتایج نشان می­ دهد که تغییرات ترسیب کربن و عناصر غذایی خاک در تیپ ­های جنگلی مورد مطالعه بیشتر تحت ­تأثیر نوع تیپ جنگلی و ارتفاع تاج­پوشش قرار می­ گیرد. لذا پیشنهاد می­ شود در مطالعات سنجش از دور جهت برآورد ترسیب کربن خاک جنگل­ های زاگرس از داده ­های لیدار که قابلیت اندازه ­گیری ارتفاع تاج­ پوشش را دارند استفاده شود.

متن کامل [PDF 648 kb]   (676 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: اکولوژی جنگل
دریافت: 1398/10/23 | پذیرش: 1399/6/23 | انتشار: 1400/3/10

فهرست منابع
1. Andrews, J.A., K.G. Harisson, R. Matamala and W.H. Schlesinger. 2000. Separation of root respiration from total soil respiration 13C labeling during Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE). Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63(5): 1429-1435. 2. Ball, B.C., A. Scott and J.P. Parker. 1999. Field N2O, CO2 and CH4 fluxes in relation to tillage Compaction and soil quality in Scotland. Soil and Tillage Research, 53: 29–39. 3. Barnes, B.V., D.R. Zak, S.R. Denton and S.H. Spurr. 1998. Forest ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, US, 774 pp. 4. Batjes, N.H. 1996. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science, 47(2): 151-163. 5. .Bayramzadeh, V. 2014. Does tree species composition control the soil carbon stocks of the Hyrcanian forest in the Northern Iran? (A case study in Guilan province, Iran). Journal of Forestry Research, 25(1): 143-146. 6. Beiranvand, R., B. Shirzad, A. Azizian and A. A. Bozorgi. 2004. Chmhsar reservoir project of Delfan. Forest Rangeland and Watershed country, 105 pp (In Persian). 7. Berg, B. and C. McClaugherty. 2008. Plant Litter: Decomposition, Humus Formation, Carbon Sequestration, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 338 pp. 8. Boley, J.D., P. Allan, A.P. Drew, E. Richard and R.E. Andrus. 2009. Effects of active pasture. Teak (Tectona grandis) and mixed native plantations on soil chemistry in Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management, 257(11): 2254-2261. 9. Breuer, L., J.A. Huisman, T. Keller and H.G. Frede. 2006. Impact of a conversion from cropland tograssland on C and N storage and related properties: analysis of a 60 year Chrono sequence. Geoderma, 133(2): 6-18. 10. Camping, T.J., R.A. Dahlgren, K.W. Tate and W.R. Horwat. 2002. Changes in soil due to grazing and oak tree removal in California blue oak woodland. In: Sandiford, R.B., McCreary, D and Purcell, k.l. Oaks in California Changing Landscape. Berkeley, CA: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, 184: 75-85. 11. Chen, C.R., Z.H. Xu and N.J. Mathers. 2004. Soil carbon pools in adjacent natural and plantation forests of subtropical Australia. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68(1): 282-291. 12. Defen, K., D. Roobroeck, M.C. Wadu, P. Lootens and P. Boeckx. 2009. Microbial community composition and rhizodeposit-carbon assimilation in differently managed temperate grassland soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41(1): 144-153. 13. Dinakaran, J. and N.S. Krishnayya. 2008. Variations in type of vegetal cover and heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in affecting sink capacity of tropical soils. Current Science, 94(9): 1144-1150. 14. Durak, T. 2012. Changes in diversity of the mountain beech forest herb layer as a function of the forest management method. Forest Ecology and Management, 276: 154-164. 15. Farhadi, P., J. Soosani, K. Adeli and V. Alijani. 2014. Analysis of Zagros forest structure using neighborhood-based indices (Case study: Ghalehgol forest, Khorramabad). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 22(2): 294-306 (In Persian). 16. Gelman, V., V. Hulkkonen, R. Kantola, M. Nousianen, V. Nousianen and M. Poku-Marboah. 2013. Impact of Forest Management Practices on Forest Carbon, Interdisciplinary Approach to Forests and Climate Change. University of Helsinky, Helsinky, 20 pp. 17. Grüneberg, E., I. Schöning, D. Hessenmöller, E.D. Schulze and W.W. Weisser. 2013. Organic layer and clay content control soil organic carbon stocks in density fractions of differently managed German beech forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 303: 1-10. 18. Han, G., X. Hao, M. Zhao, M. Wang, B.H. Ellert, W. Willms and M. Wang. 2008. Effects of grazing intensity on carbon and nitrogen in soil and vegetation in a meadow steppe in Inner Mongolia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 125(1): 21-32. 19. Hengl, T., G.B.M. Heuvelink and D.G. Rossiter. 2007. About Regression-Kriging: From equations to case studies. Computers and Geosciences, 33(10): 1301-1315. 20. Hinsinger, P., C. Plassard, C. Tang and B. Jaillard. 2003. Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: a review. Plant and Soil, 248: 43-59. 21. Huxley, A. 1992. The new RHS Dictionary of Gardening. MacMillan Press, 33-53. 22. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007. Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. 23. Isichei, A.O. and J.I. Muoghalu. 1992. The Effects of Tree Canopy Cover on Soil Fertility in a Nigerian Savanna. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 8(3): 329-338. 24. Jafari Sarabi, H., B. Pilehvar, K. Abrari and S.M. Waez-Mousavi. 2018. Investigation on changes in vegetation by effects of environmental factors using conservatism species. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 25(4): 706-718 (In Persian). 25. Jafari Sarabi, H., B. Pilehvar, K. Abrari and S.M. Waez-Mousavi. 2019. Effects of tree species diversity on leaf litter decomposition and recognizing the humus forms in the central Zagros forests, Iran. Ph.D. thesis, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, IRAN, 230 pp (In Persian). 26. Jandel, R., M. Lindner, B. Bauwens, R. Baritz, F. Hageclorn, D.W. Johnson, K. Minkkinen and K.A. Byrne. 2007. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration. Geoderma, 137(3): 253-268. 27. Kara, O. and I. Bolat. 2007. The effect of different land uses on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in Barton Province. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 32(2): 281-288. 28. Khanhasani, M., Kh. Sagheb-Talebi, R. Akhavan and Z.h. Vardanyan. 2015. The effect of environmental factors on distribution of three oak species (Q. brantii Lindl. Q. libani Oliv and Q. infectoria Oliv.) In northern Zagros forests. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 23(3): 549-561 (In Persian). 29. Kooch, Y., S.M. Hosseini, C. Zaccone, H. Jalilvand and S.M. Hojjati. 2012. Soil organic carbon sequestration as affected by afforestation: The Darab Kola forest (north of Iran) case study. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14(9): 2438-2446 (In Persian). 30. Koorem, K. and M. Moora. 2010. Positive association between understory species richness and a dominant shrub species (Corylus avellana) in a boreonemoral spruce forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(8): 1407-1413. 31. Lambers, H., J.A. Raven, G.R. Shaver and S.E. Smith. 2008. Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(2): 95-103. 32. Lovett, G.M., K.C. Weathers and M.A. Arthur. 2002. Control of nitrogen loss from forested watersheds by soil carbon: nitrogen ratio and tree species composition. Ecosystems, 5(7): 712-718. 33. Mehdifar, D., R. Karamian, Kh. Sagheb-Talebi and M. Sepahvand. 2015. Effects of some physical and chemical soil properties on quantitative characteristics of Quercus infectoria Oliv at Shine Forest of Lorestan Province. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 23(2): 234-245 (In Persian). 34. Moslemi Seyed Mahalle, S.M., S.G. Jalali, S.M. Hojjati and Y. Kooch. 2020. The Effect of Different Forest Types on Soil Properties and Biodiversity of Grassland Cover and Regeneration in Central Hyrcanian Forests (Case Study: Seri-Alandan-Sari). Ecology of Iranian Forests, 7(14): 10-21 (In Persian). 35. Nadi, H., V. Hosseini and K. Mohammadi Samani. 2018. The Effect of pear tree vegetation of chamhesar, Lorestan on Some Chemical Soil Properties. Journal of Wood & Forest Science and Technology, 25(1): 167-179 (In Persian). 36. Nave, L.E., E.D. Vance, C.W. Swanston and P.S. Curtis. 2010. Harvest impacts on soil carbon storage in temperate forests. Forest Ecology and Managemen, 259: 857-866. 37. Nijnik, M., G. Pajot, A.J. Moffat and B. Slee. 2013. An economic analysis of the establishment of forest plantations in the United Kingdom to mitigate climatic change. Forest Policy and Economics, 26: 34-42. 38. Onyekwelu, J.C., R. Mosandl and B. Stimm. 2006. Productivity, site evaluation and state of nutrition of Gmelina arborea plantations in Oluwa and Omo forest reserves. Nigeria Forest and Ecology and Management, 229(3): 214-227. 39. Owliaie, H.R., E. Adhami, H. Faraji and P. Fayyaz. 2011. Influence of Oak (Quercus brantii Lindl.) on selected soil properties of oak forests in Yasouj Region. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources Water and Soil Science, 15(56): 193-207 (In Persian). 40. Penman, J., M. Gytarsky, T. Hiraishi, Th. Krug, D. Kruger, R. Pipatti, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara, K. Tanabe and F. Wagner. 2003. Good practices guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Published by the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) for the IPCC, Japan, 590 pp. 41. Powers, R.F., M.D. Busse, K.J. McFarlane, J. Zhang and D.H. Young. 2013. Long-term effects of silviculture on soil carbon storage: does vegetation control make a difference? Journal of Forestry, 86(1): 47-58. 42. Prentice, I.C. 2001. The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide, Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 43. Quingkui, W., W. Silong and H. Yu. 2008. Comparisons of litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient return in a monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata and a mixed stand in southern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(3): 1210-1218. 44. Salehi, A., A. Mohammadi and A. Safari. 2011. Investigation and comparison of physical and chemical soil properties and quantitative characteristics of trees in less-damaged and damaged area of Zagross forests (Case study: Poldokhtar, Lorestan province). Iranian Journal of Forest, 3(1): 81-89 (In Persian). 45. Schulp, C.J.E., G.J. Naburus, P.H. Verburg and R.W. Waal. 2008. Effect of tree species on carbon stock in forest floor and mineral soil and implication for soil carbon inventories. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(3): 482-490. 46. Schulp, C.J.E., G. Nabuurs and P.H. Verburg. 2008. Future carbon sequestration in Europe -effects of land use change. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 127(2): 251-264. 47. Silveria, M.L., N.B. Comerford, K.R. Reddy, J. Prenger and W.F. DeBusk. 2010. Influence of military land uses on soil carbon dynamics in forest ecosystems of Georgia, USA. Ecological Indicators, 10(4): 905-909. 48. Thorn, M.S., C.W. Swanston, C.C. Castanha and S.E. Trumbore. 2009. Storage and turnover of natural organic matter in soil: 219-273. In: Senesi, N., Xing, B. and Ming Huang, P. (Eds.). Biophysico-chemical Processes Involving Natural Nonliving Organic Matter in Environmental System. Published by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA, 784 pp. 49. Abedi, T., S. Mohammadi Limaei, A. Eslam Bonyad and J. Torkaman. 2020. Determination of Optimum Rotation Age of Populus Deltoides Plantation in Regard to Economic Value of Carbon Sequestration. Ecology of Iranian Forests, 8(15): 22-31(In Persian). 50. Toriyama, J., M. Hak, A. Imayaa, K. Hiraia and Y. Kiyono. 2015. Effects of forest type and environmental factors on the soil organic carbon pool and its density fractions in a seasonally dry tropical forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 335: 147-155. 51. Turner, D.P., G.J. Koerper, M.E. Harmon and J.J. Lee. 1995. Carbon sequestration by forests of the United States-current status and projections to the year 2040. Tellus, 47(1): 232-239. 52. Vesterdal, L., N. Clarke, B.D. Sigurdsson and P. Gundersen. 2013. Do tree species influence soil carbon stocks in temperate and boreal forests? Forest Ecology and Management, 309: 4-18. 53. Wamelink, G.W.W., H.F. van Dobben, J.P. Mol- Dijkstra, E.P.A.G. Schouwenberg, J. Kros, W. de Vries and F. Berendse. 2009. Effect of nitrogen deposition reduction on biodiversity and carbon sequestration. Forest Ecology and Management, 258(8): 1774-1779. 54. Zarrinkafsh, M.K. 1993. Applied soil science, soil survey and soil-plant-water analysis. Tehran University Publication, Tehran, IRAN, 342 pp (In Persian). 55. Zarrinkafsh, M.K. 2002. Forestry Soil (Interaction of Soil and Plants Regarding Ecological Factors Forests Ecosystems), Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran, IRAN, 361 pp (In Persian). 56. Badehian, Z., M. Mansoori, M. Foshat and S.M. Hosseini. 2016. Investigation on the soil carbon sequestration in natural forest and different plantation types (case study: Chamestan forest, Mazandaran). Journal of Forest and Wood Products (Iranian Journal of Natural Resources), 69(3): 523-534 (In Persian).

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول


بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به بوم‏شناسی جنگل‏های ایران می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Ecology of Iranian Forest

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb